<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All in the name of scientific enquiry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>Cakes have eggs? Jaffa cakes do (well, Lidl&#039;s fake Jaffa cakes do) so I am taking that as proof they are cakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cakes have eggs? Jaffa cakes do (well, Lidl&#8217;s fake Jaffa cakes do) so I am taking that as proof they are cakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny thoyts</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8290</link>
		<dc:creator>penny thoyts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8290</guid>
		<description>wonderful. My kind of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful. My kind of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator>jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8286</guid>
		<description>So it&#039;s not exactly the _working_ in an office that you miss then, Em? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it&#8217;s not exactly the _working_ in an office that you miss then, Em? <img src='http://www.inatthedeepend.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8250</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8250</guid>
		<description>this is why I miss working in an office sometimes. (though not often I have to admit).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is why I miss working in an office sometimes. (though not often I have to admit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8245</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the answer: http://www.robertprice.co.uk/robblog/archive/2003/6/Why_Do_Stale_Biscuits_Go_Soft_.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the answer: <a href="http://www.robertprice.co.uk/robblog/archive/2003/6/Why_Do_Stale_Biscuits_Go_Soft_.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertprice.co.uk/robblog/archive/2003/6/Why_Do_Stale_Biscuits_Go_Soft_.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8244</guid>
		<description>http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes I particularly like the comparison with George Bush :lol:
http://kerroncross.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html You didn&#039;t make it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Jaffa_Cakes</a> I particularly like the comparison with George Bush <img src='http://www.inatthedeepend.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://kerroncross.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html" rel="nofollow">http://kerroncross.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html</a> You didn&#8217;t make it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for the book recommendation, Beardie.  I was aware of the legal / semantic difference between cake and biscuit; it was the chemical / physical difference I was after.  What (if anything) could you add to a biscuit or cake to make it behave like the other kind of thing?

Update to the above: the same colleagues have now discovered that substituting cold water for tea means that a ginger nut is almost as good as a fig roll.  Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for the book recommendation, Beardie.  I was aware of the legal / semantic difference between cake and biscuit; it was the chemical / physical difference I was after.  What (if anything) could you add to a biscuit or cake to make it behave like the other kind of thing?</p>
<p>Update to the above: the same colleagues have now discovered that substituting cold water for tea means that a ginger nut is almost as good as a fig roll.  Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beardie</title>
		<link>http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/comment-page-1/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>Beardie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inatthedeepend.org/2007/06/14/all-in-the-name-of-scientific-enquiry/#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>Have you seen &quot;How to dunk a doughnut: the science of everyday life&quot; by Len Fisher?  There&#039;s a whole chapter on dunking.  He concludes that the best way is to try and put the biscuit in horizontally (the biscuit, that is, not the dunker).  There&#039;s also a nice graph of tea penetration into various biscuits plotted against time.  Perhaps not too surprising that gingernuts do rather better than hobnobs (though chocolate coating makes a difference).  Over-lengthy hobnob dunking does, however, provide one with a sweet porridge to have for pudding when one&#039;s finished the tea.

Incidentally, the reason why cake goes hard while biscuits go soggy is simply that cake is cake and biscuits are biscuits.  I seem to vaguely remember this coming up as some sort of legally-accepted definition (ie if something goes soft it&#039;s a biscuit whereas if it goes hard it&#039;s a cake) as part of a dispute into whether Jaffa cakes were really cakes or biscuits (something to do with how much VAT should be charged).

Or I may have made it all up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen &#8220;How to dunk a doughnut: the science of everyday life&#8221; by Len Fisher?  There&#8217;s a whole chapter on dunking.  He concludes that the best way is to try and put the biscuit in horizontally (the biscuit, that is, not the dunker).  There&#8217;s also a nice graph of tea penetration into various biscuits plotted against time.  Perhaps not too surprising that gingernuts do rather better than hobnobs (though chocolate coating makes a difference).  Over-lengthy hobnob dunking does, however, provide one with a sweet porridge to have for pudding when one&#8217;s finished the tea.</p>
<p>Incidentally, the reason why cake goes hard while biscuits go soggy is simply that cake is cake and biscuits are biscuits.  I seem to vaguely remember this coming up as some sort of legally-accepted definition (ie if something goes soft it&#8217;s a biscuit whereas if it goes hard it&#8217;s a cake) as part of a dispute into whether Jaffa cakes were really cakes or biscuits (something to do with how much VAT should be charged).</p>
<p>Or I may have made it all up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

